Top Manual Testing Tools Every QA Engineer Should Know

Muhammad Ali By Muhammad Ali

The process of software development depends much on manual testing. Manual testing is still absolutely vital for bug discovery, usability assurance, and confirmation that software satisfies user needs even as automation is becoming more common. It is irreplaceable in some circumstances since it requires human effort and intelligence. QA engineers need the correct tools if they want to do efficient hand testing. Every QA engineer should be familiar with these leading manual testing instruments.

Advantages of Manual Testing

  • It is a 100% exploration of human judgment and creativity compared to automated tests, which makes it possible to identify issues that automated tests would not detect.
  • Actually, manual testing can easily adapt to change without the need to rewrite tests, as is the case with automated testing.
  • It provides a way to evaluate the usability which, by the way, can hardly be effective with the help of automated testing on its own.
  • Scheduled tests may overlook some issues that the use of the test can present, and this is why testers can explore the use of the test.
  • This is because testers can give immediate comments on the same hence improving on the solving of problems.

Effective Manual Testing Tools

1. Selenium

One popular tool used for web application testing is Selenium. It allows testers to write scripts in Java, Python, and C Sharp, among other computer languages. Selenium is flexible since it works well with several browsers and running systems. It is utilized by QA engineers in browser tests and regression automation suites.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Open-source and free.
  • encourages the use of multiple languages and multiple browsers.
  • Broad community support

2. JIRA

They use JIRA, which was developed by Atlassian, to help track flaws and manage test cases. While conducting manual testing, tools such as JIRA assist QA engineers in promptly identifying, tracking, and resolving problems. It enables such features as customisation of processes, detailed reports, and integration with other testing tools.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Adaptable procedures
  • Integration with Bitbucket and Confluence
  • Detailed tracking and reporting

3. TestRail

TestRail is a detailed system to provide the structure for test cases, plan the runs, and monitor the results. It offers detailed insight into the consumer quality and testing progress. TestRail integration with Jenkins, Selenium, and JIRA, among other applications.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Easy-to-use interface
  • Integration with popular tools
  • Complete analytics and reporting

4. Bugzilla

Bugzilla is an open-source Bug tracking tool created by Mozilla. Bugzilla that has a good reputation because of its reliability and rather plain interface allows QA staff members to report a fault. It offers comprehensive text and email notifications and versatile search capabilities.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Open-source and free.
  • Strong and Dependable
  • Advanced Search and Reporting

5. TestLink

TestLink is an open-source Manual Testing tool for developing and executing test cases and communicating them to the team. It provides an interface with programs such as JIRA and Bugzilla and provides a common forum to manage all the testing activity.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Free and open
  • Centralised test management
  • Integration with commonly used bug-tracking tools

6. QTest

The best and most reliable test management technology capable of both manual and automated tests is qTest, developed by Tricentis. It enables the QA team to monitor the results, coordinate test phases, and manage test cases. qTest integrates with Jenkins, Selenium, and JIRA, as well as other technologies.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Automated and hand testing can be performed.
  • Integration with well-known tools
  • Analysis and a detailed report of important metrics

7. TestComplete

Also, beneficial for manual testing, there is a refined automated manual testing tool called TestComplete developed by SmartBear. It allows QA engineers to model and execute tests for the Desktop, Web, and Mobile applications. Test Complete supports many scripting languages, and the user interface is rather basic.

Principal Characteristics:

  • It includes supporting the desktop, web, and mobile testing.
  • Easy-to-use interface
  • Multiple programming language support

8. MantisBT

MantisBT is another somewhat well-known open-source of Manual Testing tools. With regards to the functionality aspect, MantisBT is highly feature-rich and beginner-friendly, thus allowing the QA engineers to easily monitor and control the flaws. It provides such features as custom processes, notifications, and easily navigable interfaces.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Free and open-source
  • Simple, easy-to-use
  • Customisable procedures

9. HP ALM

HP ALM, or application lifecycle management, encompasses all the necessary tools for running the entire testing process. It helps the QA teams track plan and perform the testing process. Many of the requirements for strong reporting and integration are present in the HP ALM system.

Principal Characteristics:

  • Complete test control
  • Reliable reporting
  • Compatibility with popular tools

Conclusion

Manual testing is considered the pillar of assuring the quality of software developed. It has benefits such as human understanding and adaptability that cannot be fully offset by automated testing. If the right tools are used, the efficiency and effectiveness of manual testing, which QA engineers do, can be improved. From issue tracking to test management, great assistance for many facets of hand testing is available. That means learning these technologies can assist you in delivering excellent software.

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *